Have you coached a high school sports program for many years? Have you volunteered to coach a youth sports team in a recreational league? Either way, team cohesion dramatically impacts the success of your program and you as a coach.

What is team Cohesion?

Imagine a sports team as a living, breathing organism. Team cohesion is its heartbeat, the rhythm that keeps it alive and thriving. It’s not just a buzzword but a dynamic process that describes the natural tendency for a group to stick together and remain united. The pulse keeps the athletes motivated to practice, compete, and support each other. This concept is multidimensional, encompassing various aspects of team dynamics.

Task Cohesion: The level of unity of a team in task performance (e.g., teamwork and task completion within sports such as working together to win a championship); and

Social Cohesion: The level of unity of a team in social aspects (e.g., social support and friendships outside of sports).

Why Is Team Cohesion Important?

Team cohesion isn’t just a theoretical concept-it has real, tangible effects on team performance. Research has shown that a more cohesive team is more likely to perform well, and this positive cycle of cohesion and performance can lead to a more successful team overall. This is especially important for youth athletes, as team cohesion is linked to their satisfaction with the sport. It is essential to understand how task and social cohesion influence youth athletes to implement effective team-building and coaching strategies. Some general considerations are:

Task Cohesion: is more strongly related to optimal sports performance than social cohesion, demonstrating the importance of having congruent task-related goals such as making practice plans together.

Task Cohesion is generally higher in teams that require working together during the competition (e.g., track teams) than those that do not (e.g., cross-country teams).

High Social Cohesion could result in functional and dysfunctional behavioral patterns, such as enhancing motivation in a sport while creating difficulties for constructive criticism.

Motivational Climates created by coaches influence task performance and social cohesion, thus highlighting coaches’ crucial roles in creating optimal environments.

After understanding your team’s current cohesiveness, you may select some or all of the following strategies to implement. In determining your next steps, it would be helpful to consider your sport, your athletes’ characteristics (e.g., age and gender), and your coaching philosophy.

Team Environment: Foster a strong sense of “we instead of “me” through team building activities, team slogans, and social interaction within and outside the sport.

Team Structure: Instead of deciding on your athletes’ roles, offer them a chance to discuss their perceived roles and preferred responsibilities. This can enhance teamwork and accountability and empower athletes by giving them a choice in their team roles.

Team Processes: Focus on individual sacrifices and team cooperation to facilitate the process of building a strong team identity. Ask the team captains to “take a new athlete under his/her wing,” involve all athletes in establishing task-related team goals beyond individual goals, and invite athletes of similar skill levels to discuss techniques and strategies to learn from each other.

Improving team cohesion takes time. It is recommended that you regularly reflect on your own coaching and team dynamics to apply appropriate strategies to optimize both task and social cohesion. Starting to build your team early in the season and continuing your efforts throughout the season will make your team more cohesive and improve their performance.

References

Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sports groups. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213-226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

Eys, M., Loughead, T., Bray, S. R., & Carron, A. V. (2009). Development of a cohesion questionnaire for youth: The Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31(3), 390-408.

Filho, E., Dobersek, U., Gershgoren, L., Becker, B., & Tenenbaum, G. (2014). The cohesion-performance relationship in sport: A 10-year retrospective meta-analysis. Sport Sciences for Health, 10, 165–177. 

Smith, R. E., Smoll, F. L., & Cumming, S. P. (2007). Effects of a motivational climate intervention for coaches on young athletes’ sport performance anxiety. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29(1), 39-59.

Visek, A. J., Achrati, S. M., Mannix, H. M., McDonnell, K., Harris, B. S., & DiPietro, L. (2015). The fun integration theory: Toward sustaining children and adolescents sport participation. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 12(3), 424-433.

From “Me” to “We”: Promoting Team Cohesion Among Youth Athletes | Association for Applied Sport Psychology

Comments are closed.